While recognizing that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange had valid grounds to appeal extradition to the United States, the British High Court of Justice refused to consider “fresh evidence” involving the CIA.
"By drawing such a wild and erroneous conclusion, the High Court showed why they should have admitted the fresh evidence"!!! Russia really- Just like Pelosi, it's either China or Russia. Australia has said he should be returned home. Thanks for the original source pdf.
I am appalled but not surprised, and again being asked to give assurances, that were already proved and stated they can not assure... the UK are complicit in drawing out illegal corrupt judicial processes and therefore complicit in the persecution and attack upon Assange.. exactly as Nils stated in his book.. he had to write that because ALL countries and institutions are failing us. Democracy is a farce.
"By drawing such a wild and erroneous conclusion, the High Court showed why they should have admitted the fresh evidence"!!! Russia really- Just like Pelosi, it's either China or Russia. Australia has said he should be returned home. Thanks for the original source pdf.
I am appalled but not surprised, and again being asked to give assurances, that were already proved and stated they can not assure... the UK are complicit in drawing out illegal corrupt judicial processes and therefore complicit in the persecution and attack upon Assange.. exactly as Nils stated in his book.. he had to write that because ALL countries and institutions are failing us. Democracy is a farce.
Thank You Kevin
No worries once UK hands Julian to those who wish to kill him the scheming problem is solved!